JPID - Vol 05 - Issue 02

JPID Gallery > JPID - Vol 05 - Issue 02 > Guest Editorial

Guest Editorial



1. Dr Aswini Kumar K
Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwavidapeetham, Cochin.



2. Dr Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan
Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwavidapeetham, Cochin.



3. Dr Saranya S K
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwavidapeetham, Cochin.

 

The current trends in Prosthodontics

The scientific awakening of the branch of Prosthodontics in India happened two years after independence, when the premier dental college started by Dr. Rafiuddin Ahmed got affiliated to the University of Calcutta and was raised to the status of university education in 1949(1).

As dentistry were in its infancy and the practitioners were primarily exodontists, the removable prosthodontics and especially complete dentures gradually started gaining popularity. Those were the days of bakelite, celluloid or vulcanite dentures where porcelain teeth was bonded to the denture base by means of diatoric holes. The challenge of accommodating the porcelain teeth in the limited inter-arch space, were slowly answered by the introduction of acrylic resin in the 1950s.

The removable partial dentures might have preceded the complete denture fabrication in the evolution of dentistry in India. Initially were the days of untrained dental practitioners who used carved out tooth attached to self-cure. But the appropriate effective use of the materials through experience started yielding better results. The acrylic partial dentures continue to remain popular among the practicing dentists even to this day,especially to serve the immediate prosthetic needs of the common man.

As these remain to be ignored by the major text books by referring it as gum strippers or flippers, there is a lack of instructions,as manual or text books could makes our new graduates incompetent in design and fabrication of acrylic partials1.

Crude materials like Plaster of Paris or bees wax were being replaced by more user-friendly materials like zinc oxide eugenol and as technology progressed, operator comfort was enhanced with the introduction of hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials1,2.

This was followed by the advent of cast partial dentures. Though widely discussed in textbooks and during training curriculum, it remains an unpopular choice among patients due to its un-aesthetic appearance. Demands on clinical and the lab time have also resulted in reduced popularity among dentists. However, it is still a preferred option for a category of patients demanding better comfort of removable and maxillofacial prosthesis. Furthermore, the introduction of materials like Titanium, PEEK and its modifications also enhanced patient comfort.

With a view to further enhance patient comfort, elimination of visible retentive elements and problems of allergy to acrylic resin, flexible polyamide dentures base materials have been in vogue recently and have shown promising clinical results. But these materials require additional clinical research to establish its longevity.

While it was being acknowledged that removable prosthesis was not the best in terms of patient comfort and use, fixed prosthodontics gained popularity and till date is the most widely used and preferred option for replacement of lost tooth. Though fixed prosthodontics have been attempted by traditional dentists, who wound carved tooth to adjacent teeth with wires, proved to be unhygienic and crude . A more scientific and technical approach for the replacement of missing tooth with fixed partial dentures started in the 1970s. The transition of metal to metal-ceramic restorations in the 1990s was a revolution in the field of fixed partial dentures when aesthetics in addition to function was in demand. It has now evolved into the use of metal-free ceramic restorations and technology like CAD/CAM which have drastically improved the esthetics and precision and at the same time reduced laboratory time.

The advent of dental implants has been a game-changer in the field of prosthodontics. The Introduction of newer designs and surface treatments have improved the success rate of implants3,4. While the average life span of fixed partial denture is about 10 years, single implant tooth has shown a success rate above 97% for the same time period, this field has received enormous attention of dentists and researchers alike4. With the increased thrust given to implantology in the present post graduate curriculum and the knowledge of stomatognathic system, prosthodontists today play a major role in this domain. The concomitant advances in imaging technologies like CBCT have further fuelled its rise in the field of prosthetics. It has been estimated that the use of implants will near 500K per annum5. With the common complications like surgical trauma, lack of primary stability, bone necrosis, failure to osseointegrate, bacterial infection and failures due to improper loading protocols being countered by improvements in the macro and micro designs and improved treatment protocol, the implant became predictable option6–8. The predictability and the conservation of adjacent tooth structure with the preservation of the oral well-being has also increased the popularity of the implants.

The stem cell research is another field in dentistry which has the potential to transform the way the field moves. These are cells with the potential self-renewal and potency to give rise to one or sometimes many different cell types9. The 1980s saw an increased awareness of the stomatognathic system. The factors such as stress and occlusion were read together with temporomandibular disorders during these times. The introduction of T scans and allied myographic facilities improved the diagnostic potential and thereby improved the outcome of the treatment10.

The Integration of dental implants with removable prosthesis has opened up a new possibility in improving the prognostication. This is of extreme help, when the retention of removable prosthesis is difficult as in the case of maxillofacial defects. The initial maxillofacial work taken up by the prosthodontists were only the fabrication of obturators. The 1980s saw the attempts for life like facial prosthesis with acrylic. This was followed by the rapid popularity of medical grade silicon into maxillofacial prosthodontics 1990s, which could mimic the texture and appearance of the skin and there by the improving the patient acceptance and related quality of life. The branch is in the process of metamorphosis with the opening of many new centres for research and development. The recent time saw the introduction of 3D CAD-CAM technology, the colour matching of facial prosthetic elastomers to skin colour with portable spectrophotometer and computerized colour formulation. The attempts for “Active Prosthesis” such as blinking and moving eye and advancements in tissue engineering which could revolutionise reconstruction of tissue defects11,12 are promising additions to this field.

The digital technologies like rapid prototyping enables to mimic the internal and external bony morphologies and thereby creating a 3-D anatomic models of the particular patient with all the complex shapes with internal detail and undercut areas. These data may be digitally manipulated to create contact-free reproduction of facial surface features, mirror anatomic parts, and produce models in various scales to compensate for patient growth or material distortions there by reducing the operating time and improved treatment planning and outcome.13,14 Thus the practice of prosthodontics in India has undergone a metamorphosis from the work of untrained professional to an ultra-modern science incorporating the latest cutting edge technologies. Today India is contributing substantially towards the science of prosthodontics. As of now as India is emerging as the hub for manufacturing and data services, opening the door for the research activities and product development.

In order to make our speciality knowledge and skill based, newer and newer study methodologies are being adopted. The recent years have seen the introduction of mentor based small group education with thrust in research. These have evoked a critical thinking ability among the students rather than them just being knowledge consumers.11

Though dentistry is associated with high treatment costs, the demand for better function, aesthetics and thereby an improved quality of life has results in the rapidly changing trends in the field of prosthodontics. The Indian sub-continent holds the second largest population in the world and has its 7.7% of population above 60 years of age with a total prevalence of edentulism reported to be 11.7%15. The improved life expectancy notwithstanding the presence of medically compromised conditions among geriatric patients has placed a greater thrust in the speciality to improvise dental care and minimize patient discomfort. Thus the speciality has been evolving continuously by incorporating the evidence based science into the clinical scenario, there by enriching the quality of life of patient by meeting the ultimate goal to attain function, aesthetics and preservation of health.


Preferred subject areas among postgraduates in the field of Prosthodontics in India

An opinion poll was conducted among postgraduate students of Prosthodontics in India to gain insights the trends and preferences of post-graduate students among the various focus areas of the speciality. A survey was conducted as a part of National PG Convention held at Kochi in March 2020. The budding prosthodontists were asked to rate 10 specialty options in order of their preference and also suggest any other field of interest not listed in the given options. The topics listed in the questionnaire were Complete denture prosthodontics, fixed partial denture prosthesis, removable partial denture prosthesis, temporomandibular disorders and its management, maxillofacial prosthodontics, occlusion, implant prosthodontics, research, dental materials, aesthetics in prosthodontics and ‘others’.

Among the 194 responses obtained from all over India, it was observed that implantology, maxillofacial prosthesis and temporomandibular disorders and occlusion were the most preferred topics of interest while dental materials, removable prosthodontics and research were among the least preferred areas of interest. This observation is consistent with the paradigm shift that has occurred in the field of prosthodontics over the years. However, the comparatively lesser preference towards research is of concern as science is built on the pillars of research. In the field of health sciences, it is scientific research that guides the evolution of a specialty.


Discussion

There are many factors which formulate the development of interest to a subject among the students. It can range from the ease of mastering to the financial benefits. It has been noted from previous international studies that the preference of specialty is influenced by role models. This may be parents or relatives in the same profession to teachers. Students often choose clinical role models who excel in their clinical skills, usually people who accept and incorporate newer materials and techniques. As our top preferences are from the newer and evolving fields in prosthodontics, the role of mentors need to be read together(16–18).


Table: Top three preferred topics in Prosthodontics among postgraduate students

Several factors influence changing trends in a specialty. Patient demands, technological advances and economics are a few among them. Though dentistry is associated with high treatment costs, the demand for better function, esthetics and thereby an improvement in quality of life has resulted in the rapidly changing trends in the field of prosthodontics. The case in point is that of maxillofacial prosthesis which has drastically changed the lives of people.

The reduced cost and high quality of work output and the induction of cutting edge technologies into practice has paved way for India to become a dental tourism hub(19). This increased the patient number calls for more number of specialists as well as the financial benefits associated with it.

With the general social and economic improvement, the dental treatments are becoming more and more accessible a larger population. These involves an increased number of procedures for aesthetic and functional purpose. Some of these treatments with only aesthetic upliftment in mind needs a thorough knowledge of stomatognathic system. This along with other factors like increase in social and professional stress has increased the number of temporomandibular dysfunction patients(20). This demands the role of prosthodontics with a interdisciplinary approach.

The above specialties are also among the among those which involves service to the society. Eventhough maxillofacial prosthetics are not among the most financially viable, the passion to the subject along with the social service involved attracts many students.

In order to make our specialty knowledge and skill based, newer and newer study methodologies are being adopted. The recent years have seen the introduction of mentor based small group education with thrust in research. These have evoked a critical thinking ability among the students rather than them just being knowledge consumers(16). The development of interest in research needs to be emphasized as science is built on the pillars of research. In the field of health sciences, it is scientific research that guides the evolution of a specialty.

Today India is contributing substantially towards the science of prosthodontics. As of now as India is emerging as the hub for manufacturing and data services, opening the door for the research activities and product development. This requires the channelization of more and more of young professionals to research and development.

REFERENCES

  1. Nair KC. Prosthodontic Treatment Preferences in Post Independent India: An overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Jun;13(2):68–70.
  2. Papadiochos I, Papadiochou S, Emmanouil I. The Historical Evolution of Dental Impression Materials. Journal of the History of Dentistry. 2017 Summer/ Fall;65(2):79–89.
  3. Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Haas R, Watzek G, Mailath G, Pommer B. Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014 Jun;44(3):102–8.
  4. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Mosby Elsevier; 2008. 1128 p.
  5. Rustemeyer J, Bremerich A. Patients’ knowledge and expectations regarding dental implants: assessment by questionnaire. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007 Sep;36(9):814–7.
  6. Sánchez AR, Sheridan PJ, Kupp LI. Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2003 Feb;18(1):93–103.
  7. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, et al. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials. 1996 Mar;17(6):605–16.
  8. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Szmuckler-Moncler S, et al. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1998 Jan;39(1):77–85.
  9. Patil AS, Merchant Y, Nagarajan P. Tissue Engineering of Craniofacial Tissues – A Review. journal of Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering. 2013 Sep 18;2(1):6.
  10. Agbaje JO, Casteele EV de, Salem AS, Anumendem D, Shaheen E, Sun Y, et al. Assessment of occlusion with the T-Scan system in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017 Jul 13 [cited 2020 Oct 9];7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC5509719/
  11. C Pradeep Kumar, Amrutha MA, Mohammed Shahid MA. Trends in Prosthodontics: An Overview. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2016;4(2):35–9.
  12. Nuseir A, Hatamleh MM, Alnazzawi A, Al-Rabab’ah M, Kamel B, Jaradat E. Direct 3D Printing of Flexible Nasal Prosthesis: Optimized Digital Workflow from Scan to Fit. J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):10–4.
  13. Madhav VNV, Daule R. Rapid Prototyping and its Application in Dentistry. Journal of Dental and Allied Sciences. 2013 Jul 1;2(2):57.
  14. Bibb R, Eggbeer D, Evans P. Rapid prototyping technologies in soft tissue facial prosthetics: current state of the art. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2010 Jan 1;16(2):130–7.
  15. Peltzer K, Hewlett S, Yawson AE, Moynihan P, Preet R, Wu F, et al. Prevalence of loss of all teeth (edentulism) and associated factors in older adults in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014 Oct 30;11(11):11308–24.
  16. Saigal P, Takemura Y, Nishiue T, Fetters MD. Factors considered by medical students when formulating their specialty preferences in Japan: findings from a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Sep 11;7:31.
  17. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Abel T, Buddeberg C. Swiss residents’ speciality choices--impact of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals. BMC health services research. 2006 Oct 23;6:137.
  18. Numan Nafie Hameed, Ayman Abdalridha Jaleal, Ahmed, Yacob Yousef, Ahmed Daib Ahmed. Survey Study of Future Specialization Preference and the Factors Affecting the Choice of First, Second and Third Year Medical Students in College of Medicine, Baghdad University. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2017;7(1):103–7.
  19. Dhama K, Patthi B, Singla A, Gupta R, Niraj LK, Ali I, et al. Global Tourist Guide to Oral Care - A Systematic Review. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2016 Sep;10(9):ZE01–4.
  20. Jensen R, Rasmussen BK, Pedersen B, Lous I, Olesen J. Prevalence of oromandibular dysfunction in a general population. Journal of Orofacial Pain. 1993;7(2):175–82.

JPID – The journal of Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry / Volume 5 Issue 2 / Jan–Apr 2022

Copyright © 2017-2025 Indian Prosthodontic Society Kerala State Branch | IPSKERALA.COM | Powered by Dentaura.Com