Abstract:
Prosthodontists and patients are typically a high risk
group in terms of their capacity for transmission and
acquisition of infectious diseases. Every practice
should follow a stringent infection prevention plan
to minimize the risk of transmission among patients
and providers. This article is essentially a literature
review of cross-infection control measures especially
relevant to prosthodontic practice.
Key words: Asepsis, Contamination,
Disinfectant, Sterilization, Instruments,
transmission.
Introduction
Micro-organisms are ubiquitous and may cause
contamination, infection, and decay. Therefore,
it becomes necessary to remove or destroy them
from materials or areas.1
It is essential to kill or
inhibit their growth to minimize their destructive
effects. Infection is the multiplication and survival
of microorganisms on or in the body. An infection
does not always indicate disease, but disease
seldom results without infection (Miller).2
Cross infection is when a patient suffering from a disease
and new infection is set up from another host or
external source.3
Goals are:
- To destroy pathogens & prevent their
transmission.
- To reduce or eliminate microorganisms
responsible for the contamination.4
Thus a Prosthodontist while providing quality care
to its patients should also be very watchful and
vigilant to the routine of disinfection and sterilization
procedures followed in the prosthodontic office set
up for infection control.
Definition
- Asepsis may be defined as the absence of
infection or infectious materials or agents (Miller).3
- Asepsis free from infection; the prevention of
contact with microorganisms (GPT 9).5
- Asepsis is defined as freedom from infection and
the prevention of contact with microorganisms.6
Thus a prosthodontist while providing quality care
to its patients should also be very watchful and
vigilant to the routine of disinfection and sterilization procedures followed in the prosthodontic office set
up for infection control.
Categorization of instruments7
Dental instruments are divided into three groups
according to the risk of disease transmission,
according to the Centers for Disease Control.
Critical, semicritical and non-critical classifications
are based on the following criteria:
- Critical Instruments- Essential instruments used
to penetrate soft tissue or bone, or to access or
touch the bloodstream or other tissue that is usually
sterile. For example: scissors, scalers
- Semi-critical instruments are those that do
not penetrate soft tissues or bone but contact
mucous membranes or non-intact skin, such as
mirrors, reusable impression trays, and amalgam
condensers. These devices also should be sterilized
after each use. In some cases, however, sterilization
is not feasible and, therefore, high-level disinfection
is appropriate. A high-level disinfectant is
registered with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) as a “sterilant/disinfectant” and
must be labeled as such.
For example:
Prostheses which have been worn and are either
adjusted in the surgery, or repaired or adjusted in
the laboratory: medium-level disinfection.
The face bow fork: heat sterilisation.
Wax knife, if used for adjustments at the chair
side: heat sterilization
Prostheses, at try-in stage: medium-level
disinfection.
Metal dispensing syringes for impressions should
be cleaned and heat sterilized.
Bite blocks: medium-level disinfection
Polishing stones and rag wheels: heat-sterilisation if possible.
Impression trays returned from the laboratory:
aluminium or chrome plated-heat sterilization,
plastic -discard.
The handles of disposable trays can be detached
and autoclaved but corrosion and rusting may
occur after a few cycles. Sterilisation using a
chemiclave may be preferred action.
- Non-critical instruments are those that come into
contact only with intact skin examples external
components of x-ray heads, blood pressure cuffs,
and pulse oximeters. Such devices have a relatively
low risk of transmitting infection7
Sterilization of instruments
Bite blocks
- Medium level of tuberculocidal hospital
disinfectant solution can be used for disinfection
of bite block
Procedure
- Bite block is immersed in sodium hypochlorite
solution /bleach 5.25% in the dilution of 1:10 for
about 10 minutes
Mirrors (mouth & face)
- Ethylene oxide-450-800 mg
- Dry heat oven
- Chemical vapor-20 minutes at 270° F. 8
Dental Handpieces
- Water allowed to flush through the handpiece
by running if over a sink for about 20 seconds
followed which the bur is removed
- Debris is removed by scrubbing the handpiece
with detergent and water rinse and dry it off
- Good quality oil recommended by the handpiece manufacturer should be used as a lubricant.
- Expel excess oil by running the handpiece for
2 seconds, after replacing the bur or hanging the
handpiece in a handpiece rack.
- Remove the bur, if replaced. Clean the fiber-optic,
bundle ends with alcohol place the handpiece in
a clear view sterilization pouch, together with a
chemical indicator strip.
- Sterilize in an autoclave, ETOX gas or chemiclave,
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Do
not leave the handpiece in the sterilizer after the
sterilization cycle is complete.
- Remove the handpiece from the bag, insert the
bur, and use.9,10
Burs – Carbon, Steel, Diamond Points.
- Chemical vapor-20 minutes at 270° F
- Ethylene oxide-450-800 mg/l.
- Autoclave.11
Visible-light curing units
Light curing device is a potential source of
transmission of infection as both the tip and the
handle gets infected with the blood and saliva from
the oral cavity and the operators gloved hands.
- Replacing this was the autoclavable light-curing
tip.
- The handle can be disinfected using iodophores.
- Glutaraldehyde is not recommended as it causes
damage to the glass rods in the fibre optic light tip.
Procedure
- The whole unit must be cleaned properly.
- If the fiber optic light tip can be sterilized,
detach it and sterilize as recommended by the manufacturer
- Wrap the handle and light-curing tip (if not
autoclavable
- Wrap soaked with an iodophor disinfectant is
used to wrap the handle and the light-curing tip
for about 10 mins or until the unit is next used.
- The wrap is removed and the unit is cleaned
with distilled water to remove excess disinfectant.
- Some practitioners use a Clingfilm to cover the
top of the light curing tip, provided with should
not interfere with the units cooling mechanism.12
Air/water syringes and ultrasonic
scalers
- Water is flushed through the handpiece for about
10 mins. Attachments are sterilized the same way
as that of the handpiece. If possible, removable
tips should be used.10
Disinfection of impressions
According to the ADA guidelines, the impression
trays must be rinsed to remove saliva, blood, and
debris and then disinfected before sending it to
the laboratory.
The two important factors to be considered are:
- The effect of the treatment on the dimensional
stability and the surface detail of the impression.
- The deactivating effect of the impression material
on the disinfecting solution, which could reduce
the efficacy of the process.13
Polysulphides and addition-cured
silicones
- Polyvinyl siloxane, polysulfide, impression
compound, and ZOE impression materials are
thoroughly rinsed under water and immersed
in a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 minutes.14, 15
- 2% glutaraldehyde did not affect the accuracy
and dimensional stability of polyether and polyvinyl
siloxane impression materials after immersion for
30 or 60 minutes.16
Alginate
- 5.25%of sodium hypochlorite solution spray is
used for disinfection of the alginate impression
after rinsing with water followed which it is sealed
in a plastic bag.16
Agar -reversible colloids
- Agar impression is submerged into a potassium
sulphate solution for 20 mins, remove excess and
pour the impression.9
Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and
compound impressions
Immersion in 2% ID solution of 20 minutes does
not have any adverse effects on the dimensional
stability or surface details reproduction of the
rigid material.17
Dapen dishes
Steam autoclave- 121°C for 15 to 20 minutes at 15
lb pressure/square inch,
- Dry heat oven-160°C for 1 hour,
- Chemical vapor-20 minutes at 270° F
- Ethylene oxide-450-800 mg/l.10
Glass slabs
- Steam autoclave- 121°C for 15 to 20 minutes at
15 lb pressure/square inch,
- Dry heat oven-160°C for 1 hour
- Chemical vapor-20 minutes at 270° F
- Ethylene oxide-450-800 mg/l.10
Saliva Evacuators, Ejectors
- Ethylene oxide-450-800 mg/l.10
Orthodontic pliers
- High-quality pliers: steam, dry heat, chemical
vapour, ethylene oxide gas.
- Low-quality pliers: steam autoclave is not
preferred as it is damaging to the material.
- In pliers with plastic parts, ethylene oxide
sterilization is the only effective method.18
Disinfection of occlusal rims, bite
registrations:
- First, they are rinsed under water, sprayed with
5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution and placed
in a plastic bag for 10 minutes.19
Impression trays
- Aluminium & chrome-plated – heat sterilized via
autoclave, chemical vapour or dry heat; ethylene
oxide sterilization.
- Custom acrylic resin – disinfect with tuberculocidal
hospital disinfectant for reuse during the same
patient’s next visit.
- Plastic: should be discarded.20
Disinfection of casts
- Casts are sprayed with 5.25%sodium hypochlorite
solution and allowed to set for 10 mins. Care should
be taken not to cause damage to the casts.21
Disinfecting prostheses
Metal dentures
- Sprayed with 2% glutaraldehyde solution and
held in a plastic bag for 10 minutes.22
Acrylic dentures
- Immersed in 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution
for 10 minutes.21
Discussion
Sterilization has gained keen awareness by the
public and the profession due to increased risk
and knowledge of transmissible diseases. This
has led to an effective infection control program in
the dental office and laboratory for the protection
of the staff and the patients and is considered the
standard of care. Even though Prosthodontist does
not grossly invade the tissues or treat infectious
diseases, still the patient carries microorganism
that can be transmitted to others. In today’s
world, there are many professional, moral and
medicolegal considerations that make sterilization
and disinfection techniques imperative. Adequate
attention on prevention of cross-infection has been
largely ignored by the Prosthodontist probably
because they adopt non-invasive procedures.
Many features of dental office contribute to the
mode of transmission of infection, as even moving
instruments can spread infection in dental office
set up.
CONCLUSION
Time has come when it has become essential that
infection control is put to practice instead of just
discussing in theory; lest irreversible harm may be
caused to our patient or the staff which helps us
achieve successful treatment goals. Sterilization &
Disinfection of patient care instruments & material
used is part of Infection control protocol in health
care setting including dental care.
REFERENCES
- Ananthanarayan & Paniker. Textbook of Microbiology.
8th ed.pg30
- Infection Control and Management of Hazardous
Materials for the Dental Team by Chris H. Miller, Charles
John Palenik; 5th edition.pg83
- SathishGupte. The Short Textbook of Medical
Microbiology. 10th edition.pg 46.
- Willey, Sherwood, Woolverton. Pre Scott, Hartey & Klein’s Microbiology –7th Edition pg149
- The Glossary Of Prosthodontics terms JPD 2017;117(55):12.
- Dorland WAN. Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary.
32th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier/Saunders; 2011.
- Sterilization & disinfection of dental instruments- ADA
2001;Vol;132(6):785.
- Naveen.B.H, Kashinath.K.R, Jagdeesh. K.N, Rashmi B.
Mandoka. Infection Control In Prosthodontics Journal
of Dental Sciences & Research 2011,FEB;2(1):93-108.
- Sturdevant C.M. et al. The Art and Science of Operative
Dentistry, 5th Edition, C.V. Mosby Co. 1995.
- Council on dental materials. Infection control
recommendation for a dental office and dental laboratory
by the council of dental materials, JADA 1988, Feb; 116(2):
241-248.
- Robert W. Schutt. A procedure to sterilize dental burs
with dry heat JPD 1990, FEB;63(2):246.
- ShilpaKalra, Dr. Tulika Tripathi, Dr. PriyankRaI. Infection
Control in Orthodontics Journal of orthodontics and
endodontics2015;1(1:1):1-12.
- McNeill MR, Coulter WA, Hussey DL. Disinfection of
irreversible Hydrocolloid impressions: A comparative
study. Int J Prosthodont. 1992 Nov-Dec;5(6):563-7.
- Westerholm HS, Bradley, Jr DV, Schwdrtz RS. Efficacy of
various spray disinfectants on irreversible hydrocolloid
impressions.Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:47-54.
- Bergman B. Disinfection of prosthodontic impression
materials: A literature review. Int J Prosthodont 1989;
2:536-542.
- Maria delPilar Rios et al.Effects of chemical disinfectant
solutions on the stability and accuracy of the dental
impression complex. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:356-62.
- Fong. PG, Walter JD.The effects of an immersion
disinfection regime on rigid impression materials.Int J
Prosthodont 1990; 3:522 -7.
- Mazzocchi AR, Paganelli C, Morandini C. Effects of 3
types of sterilization on orthodontic pliers. J. Clin. Orthod
1994; Vol XXVIII: 644-647.
- Naylor WP. Prosthodontic items of interest.Int J Prosthodont.
1992; 5:188-9.
- Vidya S Bhat, Mallika S Shetty, Kamalakanth K. Shenoy.
Infection control in the prosthodontic laboratory. The
journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2007; 7(2):62-5.
- Neeraj Rampal, Salil Pawah, Pankaj Kaushik. Infection
Control in Prosthodontics. J Oral Health Comm Dent
2010;4(1):7-11.
- Phull, Siddharth, Arora, Arvind,Yashendra. Sterilization
& disinfection in prosthodontics. Indian Journal Dental
Science Oct 2014;6(4):112-116.